USA News Hub

Climate change is becoming more severe largely due to excess greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon dioxide is one of the most prevalent gases contributing to rising temperatures worldwide — and while limiting emissions is a priority to curb climate change, scientists have also been exploring ways to mitigate the effects by removing atmospheric CO2. Fine glacier powder, or rock flour, could be an effective tool because of its essentially unlimited quantity and the fact that it can also be used to improve agricultural crop yields. 

What is rock flour?

Glacier dust could potentially soak up carbon emissions. Rock flour is “ultrafine powder ground down by … melting glaciers,” said The Washington Post, and has been seen in vast quantities in Greenland. “Over centuries, the tremendous weight of the ice grinds the rock underneath into a fine powder only a few ten-thousandths of a centimeter, or microns, in diameter — finer than most sand found on a beach.” Along with removing atmospheric carbon, the material is also nutrient-dense and can be used as a fertilizer for agricultural purposes.

“Natural chemical reactions break down the rock powder and lead to CO2 from the air being fixed in new carbonate minerals,” said The Guardian. Two studies from March 2023 and May 2023 highlighted the potential of rock flour as a way to improve crop yield and suck carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. “Unlike other sources of silicate minerals for enhanced weathering, glacial rock flour does not need any processing, and the amount available in Greenland is effectively unlimited,” Christiana Dietzen, a soil scientist at the Globe Institute at the University of Copenhagen who worked on both studies, said in a statement. In addition, “compared to an organic fertilizer, which provided additional potassium, magnesium, and sulfur, the glacial rock flour actually worked better, presumably because it provides a wider array of plant nutrients.”

How can it help fight climate change?

Rock flour’s potential has only just scratched the surface. “We have only reached 8% of the glacial rock flour’s potential to transform CO2 in three years. The implication here is that though this process is effective, it is not a quick solution, but could take decades to realize its full potential,” said Dietzen. “The rock flour works best in certain soil — slightly but not too acidic,” said the Post. “Researchers need to measure more precisely how much CO2 [farming] techniques are taking up, so farmers and others can eventually make money by selling carbon credits.” In other words, not enough is known about rock flour to begin sprinkling it on fields just yet. 

However, “there’s a novelty to the idea in using pre-ground material,” said Bob Hilton, a geochemist from the University of Oxford, to the Post. “There’s interest in the idea because glacier processes produce huge amounts of this material.” The mineral can also “easily be shipped to the farmers in containers,” Verner Hammeken, the former CEO of Greenland shipping company Royal Arctic Line, said to Reuters — though this may come with its own complications. “It is important to account for the carbon footprint of transporting the material to make sure that the use of glacial rock flour is truly carbon negative and to avoid using it in locations where the transport emissions would outweigh CO2 uptake,” Dietzen said.