USA News Hub

Westminster continues to reel from the so-called honeytrap scandal, with debate raging as to whether it’s the work of a hostile foreign state or a political insider.

Tory MP William Wragg went public last week to confirm he had been blackmailed into giving out numbers of colleagues after sending explicit pictures to someone called “Charlie” on the dating app Grindr. Wragg stood down last night from his roles as head of the Commons’ public administration and constitutional affairs committee and vice-chairman of the 1922 Committee of Tory backbenchers.

At least 15 people – all of them male – are now believed to have been targeted by the “spear phishing” account, including journalists, researchers and MPs from across the political spectrum.

Calling Wragg’s actions “exceptionally inappropriate and ill-advised”, cabinet minister Mel Stride told GB News that “the overarching lesson for all of us in public life here is to proceed with great caution in the circumstances”. As the scandal continues to unfold, the question now is whether MPs, those who work for them and those who report on them, will heed his advice or carry on as before?

While some senior politicians – most notably Chancellor Jeremy Hunt – have backed Wragg, others have been less forgiving. “To give out the telephone numbers of other MPs is not only a serious breach of trust towards his colleagues, it also raises some quite serious security questions, too” said Nigel Farage in The Telegraph. “What he did was unforgivable in every way.”

Beyond “the embarrassment of a few Westminster insiders”, which “provides endless opportunities for tabloid amusement”, said The Observer in its editorial, there is “a more serious problem: the way the pathological addiction to WhatsApp of Britain’s ruling elite has undermined democratic institutions and conventions”.

The Covid crisis had already exposed Westminster’s over-reliance on private messaging apps that, in the words of David Omand, a former head of GCHQ and one-time permanent secretary at the Home Office, “might suit gossip and informal exchanges but is inappropriate for important decision-making”.

If the pandemic raised questions about transparency and accountability then the honeytrap scandal has shone a light on security procedures within the Westminster bubble in the era of instant communications.

The popularity of direct messaging and social networks makes targeted attacks “easier to carry out,” said Politico, “with malign actors able to create virtual numbers and buy cheap SIM cards on the high street”.

What next?

The nature of this scandal and the fact that it involves the Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats mean it is “unlikely to become a party-political issue”, said James Heale in The Spectator.

The long-term consequences for the intimate circle of MPs and journalists are likely to depend on who is identified as being behind the blackmailing operation. There is “considerable debate” in Westminster as to whether a hostile state actor was involved, said Heale, and the scandal has “alarmed security hawks” within the Conservative Party, “who believe state-sponsored cyber-attacks are on the rise”, said Politico.

But in a sign the authorities are not yet treating it as such, The Sun’s political editor Harry Cole said on X that “it continues to be stressed this is a police matter not one for the security services”.

The so-called Westminster honeytrapper is believed to have been at the Labour Party conference in Liverpool last year, said The Times, “fuelling speculation that the perpetrator is a political insider”.

Dominik Wojtczak, head of the Cybersecurity Institute at the University of Liverpool, told Politico the messages were likely part of a “spear phishing attack” and “the purpose is most likely to simply obtain indecent images of the victims and then blackmail them”.

But this misses the point entirely, said Farage. “It is totally irrelevant whether ‘Charlie’ or any other dark actors linked to the Wragg scandal are working for the Russians, the Chinese, or a scurrilous website,” he wrote. “Those who are in public office have to be held to a higher standard than everybody else. If not, breakdown will follow.”

Calling for an investigation to “help to establish whether there are any other Wraggs in Parliament who have been similarly compromised”, Farage said: “We ought to think about the security implications of MPs giving out to blackmailers confidential telephone numbers.”

The former Ukip leader concluded: “The security of the nation and the safety of the public could depend on it.”