The latest allegation from Bolton’s unpublished book, which is due out in March, comes as the Senate appears ready to acquit Trump in an impeachment trial focused on allegations he used his office to pressure Ukraine to investigate his political rivals.
The May meeting would mark the earliest known instance of Trump’s involvement in the Ukraine pressure campaign that sparked off the impeachment inquiry.
In a statement obtained by The Hill, Trump denied the latest allegation from his former national security adviser, who left the White House in September.
“I never instructed John Bolton to set up a meeting for Rudy Giuliani, one of the greatest corruption fighters in America and by far the greatest mayor in the history of N.Y.C., to meet with President Zelensky,” Trump said in a statement. “That meeting never happened.”
Giuliani told the Times in a brief interview that the claim about the meeting involving Mulvaney and Cipollone was “categorically untrue.”
Reports on allegations contained in Bolton’s unpublished manuscript have leaked out in recent days, adding to the drama surrounding Trump’s impeachment trial.
Cipollone’s involvement in meetings about the pressure campaign on Ukraine would place additional scrutiny on the White House counsel. While leading Trump’s defense in the impeachment trial, Cipollone has insisted there is no evidence of wrongdoing by the president and argued that the Senate does not need to hear from Bolton.
The Times first reported Sunday that Bolton writes in the manuscript that Trump said he did not want to release nearly $400 million in security aid for Ukraine until the country agreed to help investigate his political rivals.
The White House released a letter on Wednesday indicating it would seek to block publication of the manuscript on the grounds it contains classified information, escalating the fight over the book.
Democrats have pushed to subpoena the former national security adviser as a witness, insisting he has relevant, firsthand information about Trump’s attempts to leverage the presidency for political gain.
But Republicans are likely to have enough votes to block subpoenaing additional witnesses and evidence, instead moving to acquit Trump as early as Friday night. Sen. Lamar AlexanderAndrew (Lamar) Lamar AlexanderThe Memo: Trump tries to steal Democrats’ thunder in Iowa Alexander to vote no on witnesses, bringing trial close to end Collins to vote to allow witnesses in Trump impeachment trial MORE (R-Tenn.), seen as the swing vote on the issue, said late Thursday that while Trump’s conduct was “inappropriate,” it does not warrant removal from office and therefore he would not support calling new witnesses.
Updated at 12:45 p.m.