Nissan’s Saikawa Reportedly Approved Ghosn’s Retirement Deal; Coup Claims Emerge

<img data-attachment-id="1664882" data-permalink data-orig-file="" data-orig-size="2222,1843" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"Nissan","camera":"","caption":"President, CEO and Representative Director, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"\u00a9 2017 Nissan","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"Hiroto Saikawa","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="Hiroto Saikawa" data-image-description="


” data-medium-file=”×350.jpg” data-large-file=”×506.jpg” class=”aligncenter size-large wp-image-1664882″ src=”×506.jpg” alt width=”610″ height=”506″ srcset=”×506.jpg 610w,×62.jpg 75w,×350.jpg 422w,×637.jpg 768w,×100.jpg 120w” sizes=”(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px”>

The arrest of Carlos Ghosn, former head of the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance, seemed a rather straightforward back in November. By the time he was changing into his orange pajamas (or whatever color is most common in Japanese prisons), Nissan chief executive Hiroto Saikawa announced Ghosn had been dismissed from the company’s board. At the time, he claimed Ghosn and his top aide (Greg Kelly) underreported their compensation and misused corporate assets.

However, it wasn’t long until the narrative grew more complex. Following global accusations that Japanese courts could not be counted on for fair treatment, due to their ludicrously high 99-percent conviction rate, Ghosn began telling the press he believed he was on the receiving end of a corporate coup devised by Nissan. Slowly but surely, minor evidence supporting his claims trickled in.

On Wednesday, an external committee reviewing Nissan’s corporate governance suggested that enough facts exist to suspect Carlos of violating securities law and misusing company funds. However, the committee’s findings include a line indicating that Saikawa signed off on Ghosn’s retirement package. 

“Regarding the post retirement treatment of Mr. Ghosn, Mr. Ghosn, through Mr. Kelly as the person responsible for Global Human Resources and Legal, obtained documents signed by the current CEO,” Bloomberg quoted the committee as saying, noting that the panel did not elaborate on the contents of the retirement deal.

When asked whether there were any problems with the documents, Nissan declined to comment. However, Ghosn’s legal team continues to maintain that he acted with full authority of the board and its shareholders at all times, and was only interested in “achieving value for Nissan’s shareholders.”

One document, entitled “Employment agreement,” proposed a non-compete agreement for Ghosn’s retirement. Saikawa and Kelly were the officials who typically signed those type of agreements, an inside source explained.

From Bloomberg:

According to the document seen by Bloomberg, Ghosn was to receive a $40 million lump sum and an annual salary of $4.4 million with the title of adviser and chairman emeritus. He would also receive title to the three Nissan-owned homes, and a stake in Lebanese supplier Rymco, as well as use of offices including at Nissan’s Yokohama headquarters.

The Financial Times earlier reported that Saikawa approved an employment contract for Ghosn as chairman emeritus, citing a 2012 document that it said may not have been a final agreement.

Ghosn’s lawyers have said that the accusations against the executive are flawed because he never signed written agreements that he was to receive any deferred payments after retirement.

Without more information, it’s difficult to guess how damning Saikawa’s claimed approvals might be. But it is strange that the review committee neglected to provide additional information. Likewise, the CEO’s about-face on an earlier promise that he would soon retire has raised a few eyebrows. Even if he’s totally innocent, Saikawa will no doubt be subjected to additional scrutiny in the future.

None of this makes Ghosn appear innocent, however. A recent report in The Wall Street Journal claimed Nissan’s top brass was indeed plotting to put the defamed executive in jail in order to torpedo a European takeover, but stopped short of suggesting Ghosn committed no crimes. Even his lawyer, Junichiro Hironaka, has been careful not to call Ghosn guilt-free. Instead, he’s trying to build a case that Nissan’s plot to oust him severely tainted their criminal investigation.

“If a foreign company came in and took over a majority stake, it would be shocking,” said Carla Bailo, CEO of industry think tank The Center for Automotive Research and a former Nissan executive. “[Japan is] a very prideful nation.”

Unfortunately for Nissan, Renault has already brought up the possibility of a merger.

[Image: Nissan]

Leave a Reply